[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14934782#comment-14934782
]
Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-9170:
--------------------------------------------
I don't have any objections to moving libhdfs, fuse-dfs, and libwebhdfs to a
separate hadoop-hdfs-native-client module. However, if the unit tests are
moving with them, they will still be depending on MiniDFSCluster in a different
module (i.e. hadoop-hdfs module). So I'm not sure how creating a separate
module is better than moving everything to hadoop-hdfs-client. Perhaps I'm
misunderstanding something.
> Move libhdfs / fuse-dfs / libwebhdfs to a separate module
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-9170
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9170
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Haohui Mai
> Assignee: Haohui Mai
>
> After HDFS-6200 the Java implementation of hdfs-client has be moved to a
> separate hadoop-hdfs-client module.
> libhdfs, fuse-dfs and libwebhdfs still reside in the hadoop-hdfs module.
> Ideally these modules should reside in the hadoop-hdfs-client. However, to
> write unit tests for these components, it is often necessary to run
> MiniDFSCluster which resides in the hadoop-hdfs module.
> This jira is to discuss how these native modules should layout after
> HDFS-6200.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
