[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14935973#comment-14935973
]
Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-1172:
---------------------------------
# It is not necessary to call {{numNodes}} again. We can directly use
{{numNodes}}.
{code}
int numNodes = curBlock.numNodes();
......
+ DatanodeStorageInfo[] expectedStorages =
+ curBlock.getUnderConstructionFeature().getExpectedStorageLocations();
+ if (curBlock.numNodes() < expectedStorages.length) {
{code}
# We'd better place the new "adding block to pending replica queue" logic only
in {{checkReplication}}. Several reasons for this:
#* {{completeBlock}} is also called by {{forceCompleteBlock}}, which is invoked
when loading edits. At this time we should not update pending replication queue
since the NN is just being started.
#* {{completeBlock}} can often be called when NN has only received 1
block_received msg, updating pending replication queue at this time means later
when further IBRs (incremental block reports) come we need to remove these DN
from pending queue again.
#* Semantically updating pending queue is more closely coupled with updating
neededReplication queue.
# Instead of making changes to {{PendingBlockInfo}}'s constructor, when
updating the pending replication queue, you can prepare all the corresponding
{{DatanodeDescriptor}} in an array first, and call
{{pendingReplications.increment}} only once.
# Do we need to call {{computeAllPendingWork}} in
{{TestReplication#pendingReplicationCount}}?
# Let's add a maximum retry count or total waiting time for
{{waitForNoPendingReplication}}.
> Blocks in newly completed files are considered under-replicated too quickly
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-1172
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1172
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 0.21.0
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Assignee: Masatake Iwasaki
> Attachments: HDFS-1172-150907.patch, HDFS-1172.008.patch,
> HDFS-1172.009.patch, HDFS-1172.010.patch, HDFS-1172.patch, hdfs-1172.txt,
> hdfs-1172.txt, replicateBlocksFUC.patch, replicateBlocksFUC1.patch,
> replicateBlocksFUC1.patch
>
>
> I've seen this for a long time, and imagine it's a known issue, but couldn't
> find an existing JIRA. It often happens that we see the NN schedule
> replication on the last block of files very quickly after they're completed,
> before the other DNs in the pipeline have a chance to report the new block.
> This results in a lot of extra replication work on the cluster, as we
> replicate the block and then end up with multiple excess replicas which are
> very quickly deleted.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
