[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kihwal Lee updated HDFS-9178:
-----------------------------
    Attachment: HDFS-9178.branch-2.6.patch

Attaching a patch for branch-2.6, in case someone wants it.

> Slow datanode I/O can cause a wrong node to be marked bad
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9178
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9178
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.7.2
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-9178.branch-2.6.patch, HDFS-9178.patch
>
>
> When non-leaf datanode in a pipeline is slow on or stuck at disk I/O, the 
> downstream node can timeout on reading packet since even the heartbeat 
> packets will not be relayed down.  
> The packet read timeout is set in {{DataXceiver#run()}}:
> {code}
>   peer.setReadTimeout(dnConf.socketTimeout);
> {code}
> When the downstream node times out and closes the connection to the upstream, 
> the upstream node's {{PacketResponder}} gets {{EOFException}} and it sends an 
> ack upstream with the downstream node status set to {{ERROR}}.  This caused 
> the client to exclude the downstream node, even thought the upstream node was 
> the one got stuck.
> The connection to downstream has longer timeout, so the downstream will 
> always timeout  first. The downstream timeout is set in {{writeBlock()}}
> {code}
>           int timeoutValue = dnConf.socketTimeout +
>               (HdfsConstants.READ_TIMEOUT_EXTENSION * targets.length);
>           int writeTimeout = dnConf.socketWriteTimeout +
>               (HdfsConstants.WRITE_TIMEOUT_EXTENSION * targets.length);
>           NetUtils.connect(mirrorSock, mirrorTarget, timeoutValue);
>           OutputStream unbufMirrorOut = NetUtils.getOutputStream(mirrorSock,
>               writeTimeout);
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to