[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963006#comment-14963006
]
Kai Sasaki commented on HDFS-8287:
----------------------------------
[~rakeshr] Great. Thank you so much for reviewing.
{quote}
Any specific reason to use cachedThreadPool?
{quote}
Currently, there is no reason to use {{cachedThreadPool}} here. We can use
{{newFixedThreadPool}} because parity gen task is always threw only 1 at the
maximum. And these thread pools are used only by {{DFSStripedOutputStream}}. So
I think it might be better to keep inside {{DFSStripedOutputStream}} not
{{DFSClient}}.
> DFSStripedOutputStream.writeChunk should not wait for writing parity
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-8287
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8287
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: hdfs-client
> Reporter: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze
> Assignee: Kai Sasaki
> Attachments: HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.00.patch,
> HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.01.patch, HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.02.patch,
> HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.03.patch, HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.04.patch,
> HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.05.patch, HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.06.patch,
> HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.07.patch, HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.08.patch,
> HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.09.patch, HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.10.patch,
> HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.11.patch, HDFS-8287-HDFS-7285.WIP.patch,
> HDFS-8287-performance-report.pdf, HDFS-8287.12.patch, h8287_20150911.patch,
> jstack-dump.txt
>
>
> When a stripping cell is full, writeChunk computes and generates parity
> packets. It sequentially calls waitAndQueuePacket so that user client cannot
> continue to write data until it finishes.
> We should allow user client to continue writing instead but not blocking it
> when writing parity.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
