[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14983906#comment-14983906
 ] 

Yi Liu edited comment on HDFS-4937 at 10/31/15 8:45 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------

I did consider the situation you mentioned, But I thought in real env the NN 
could find other racks/DNs if it has gone through enough (not all) number of 
nodes.  But I missed the fact that many tests may only contain few available 
DNs, and {{refreshCounter <= excludedNodes.size()}} will be true, also in real 
env this also may happen if total number of DNs is few.  So the patch should 
not be correct for these cases, revert them.


was (Author: hitliuyi):
I did consider the situation you mentioned, But I thought in real env the NN 
could find other racks/DNs if it has gone through enough number of nodes.  But 
I missed the fact that many tests may only contain few available DNs, and 
{{refreshCounter <= excludedNodes.size()}} will be true, also in real env this 
also may happen if total number of DNs is few.  So the patch should not be 
correct for these cases, revert them.

> ReplicationMonitor can infinite-loop in 
> BlockPlacementPolicyDefault#chooseRandom()
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-4937
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4937
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.4-alpha, 0.23.8
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>              Labels: BB2015-05-TBR
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.7.2
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-4937.patch, HDFS-4937.v1.patch, HDFS-4937.v2.patch
>
>
> When a large number of nodes are removed by refreshing node lists, the 
> network topology is updated. If the refresh happens at the right moment, the 
> replication monitor thread may stuck in the while loop of {{chooseRandom()}}. 
> This is because the cached cluster size is used in the terminal condition 
> check of the loop. This usually happens when a block with a high replication 
> factor is being processed. Since replicas/rack is also calculated beforehand, 
> no node choice may satisfy the goodness criteria if refreshing removed racks. 
> All nodes will end up in the excluded list, but the size will still be less 
> than the cached cluster size, so it will loop infinitely. This was observed 
> in a production environment.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to