[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033155#comment-15033155
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9269:
---------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 10m 
7s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 34s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_85 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 21s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
16s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_85 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
17s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_85 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 18s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
16s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shellcheck {color} | {color:red} 0m 12s 
{color} | {color:red} The applied patch generated 5 new shellcheck issues 
(total was 98, now 103). {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_85 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 1m 1s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-native-client in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.8.0_66. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 56s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-native-client in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_85. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
29s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 20m 49s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:0ca8df7 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12774945/HDFS-9269.003.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-9269 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  shellcheck  |
| uname | Linux e45edaa158f7 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 1c05393 |
| shellcheck | v0.4.1 |
| shellcheck | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/13701/artifact/patchprocess/diff-patch-shellcheck.txt
 |
| JDK v1.7.0_85  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/13701/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-native-client U: 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-native-client |
| Max memory used | 75MB |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus   http://yetus.apache.org |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/13701/console |


This message was automatically generated.



> Need to update the documentation and wrapper for fuse-dfs
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9269
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>            Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: supportability
>         Attachments: HDFS-9269.001.patch, HDFS-9269.002.patch, 
> HDFS-9269.003.patch
>
>
> To reproduce the bug in HDFS-9268, I followed the wiki, the doc and read the 
> wrapper script of fuse-dfs, but found them super outdated. (the wrapper was 
> last updated four years ago, and the hadoop project layout has dramatically 
> changed since then). I am creating this JIRA to track the status of the 
> update.
> There are quite a few external blogs/discussion threads floating around the 
> internet which talked about how to update the scripts, but no one took the 
> time to update them here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to