[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15036774#comment-15036774
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9144:
---------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 7s {color} 
| {color:red} HDFS-9144 does not apply to HDFS-8707. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-9144 |
| GITHUB PR | https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/43 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus   http://yetus.apache.org |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/13740/console |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/13740/console |


This message was automatically generated.



> Refactor libhdfs into stateful/ephemeral objects
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9144
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9144
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: hdfs-client
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-8707
>            Reporter: Bob Hansen
>            Assignee: Bob Hansen
>         Attachments: HDFS-9144.HDFS-8707.001.patch, 
> HDFS-9144.HDFS-8707.002.patch, HDFS-9144.HDFS-8707.003.patch, 
> HDFS-9144.HDFS-8707.004.patch, HDFS-9144.HDFS-8707.005.patch, 
> HDFS-9144.HDFS-8707.006.patch
>
>
> In discussion for other efforts, we decided that we should separate several 
> concerns:
> * A posix-like FileSystem/FileHandle object (stream-based, positional reads)
> * An ephemeral ReadOperation object that holds the state for 
> reads-in-progress, which consumes
> * An immutable FileInfo object which holds the block map and file size (and 
> other metadata about the file that we assume will not change over the life of 
> the file)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to