[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15048644#comment-15048644
 ] 

Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-8578:
-------------------------------------

[~aw], yetus is not actually running in docker.
{noformat}JAVA_HOME: /home/jenkins/tools/java/jdk1.7.0_79 does not exist. 
Dockermode: attempting to switch to another.
Running in Jenkins mode
Processing: HDFS-8578{noformat}

> On upgrade, Datanode should process all storage/data dirs in parallel
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8578
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8578
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode
>            Reporter: Raju Bairishetti
>            Assignee: Vinayakumar B
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HDFS-8578-01.patch, HDFS-8578-02.patch, 
> HDFS-8578-03.patch, HDFS-8578-04.patch, HDFS-8578-05.patch, 
> HDFS-8578-06.patch, HDFS-8578-07.patch, HDFS-8578-08.patch, 
> HDFS-8578-09.patch, HDFS-8578-10.patch, HDFS-8578-11.patch, 
> HDFS-8578-12.patch, HDFS-8578-13.patch, HDFS-8578-14.patch, 
> HDFS-8578-branch-2.6.0.patch, HDFS-8578-branch-2.7-001.patch, 
> HDFS-8578-branch-2.7-002.patch
>
>
> Right now, during upgrades datanode is processing all the storage dirs 
> sequentially. Assume it takes ~20 mins to process a single storage dir then  
> datanode which has ~10 disks will take around 3hours to come up.
> *BlockPoolSliceStorage.java*
> {code}
>    for (int idx = 0; idx < getNumStorageDirs(); idx++) {
>       doTransition(datanode, getStorageDir(idx), nsInfo, startOpt);
>       assert getCTime() == nsInfo.getCTime() 
>           : "Data-node and name-node CTimes must be the same.";
>     }
> {code}
> It would save lots of time during major upgrades if datanode process all 
> storagedirs/disks parallelly.
> Can we make datanode to process all storage dirs parallelly?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to