[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15061297#comment-15061297
 ] 

Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-7964:
---------------------------------

The patch looks good to me. One nit is that two places in FSEditLogAsync have 
some commented code:
{code}
      //if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
        LOG.info("logSync "+edit);
      //}
{code}

+1 after addressing this.

Besides, the current postponeResponse/sendResponse code uses a counter to delay 
the response. This looks a little hacky to me. But I understand this may be the 
only way to add the new functionality without changing the original code. Maybe 
we can do some extra refactoring in the future.

> Add support for async edit logging
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7964
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7964
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.2-alpha
>            Reporter: Daryn Sharp
>            Assignee: Daryn Sharp
>         Attachments: HDFS-7964.patch, HDFS-7964.patch, HDFS-7964.patch
>
>
> Edit logging is a major source of contention within the NN.  LogEdit is 
> called within the namespace write log, while logSync is called outside of the 
> lock to allow greater concurrency.  The handler thread remains busy until 
> logSync returns to provide the client with a durability guarantee for the 
> response.
> Write heavy RPC load and/or slow IO causes handlers to stall in logSync.  
> Although the write lock is not held, readers are limited/starved and the call 
> queue fills.  Combining an edit log thread with postponed RPC responses from 
> HADOOP-10300 will provide the same durability guarantee but immediately free 
> up the handlers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to