[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15063496#comment-15063496
 ] 

Rui Li commented on HDFS-8461:
------------------------------

Hi, I got a question about the following code of the patch:
{code}
    } else if ((curReplicas - dataBlkNum) * 3 < parityBlkNum + 1) {
      // can only afford one replica loss
      // this is considered very under-replicated
      return QUEUE_VERY_UNDER_REPLICATED;
{code}
To make the code consistent with the comment, shall we change the condition to 
{{if (curReplicas - dataBlkNum == 1)}} or {{if ((curReplicas - dataBlkNum) * 
parityBlkNum < parityBlkNum + 1)}}?
The current code doesn't work properly when I tried to add multiple EC policies 
in HDFS-7866, where parityBlkNum!=3.

> Erasure coding: fix priority level of UnderReplicatedBlocks for striped block
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8461
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8461
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Walter Su
>            Assignee: Walter Su
>             Fix For: HDFS-7285
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-8461-HDFS-7285.001.patch, 
> HDFS-8461-HDFS-7285.002.patch
>
>
> Issues 1: correctly mark corrupted blocks.
> Issues 2: distinguish highest risk priority and normal risk priority.
> {code:title=UnderReplicatedBlocks.java}
>   private int getPriority(int curReplicas,
>   ...
>     } else if (curReplicas == 1) {
>       //only on replica -risk of loss
>       // highest priority
>       return QUEUE_HIGHEST_PRIORITY;
>   ...
> {code}
> For stripe blocks, we should return QUEUE_HIGHEST_PRIORITY when curReplicas 
> == 6( Suppose 6+3 schema).
> That's important. Because
> {code:title=BlockManager.java}
> DatanodeDescriptor[] chooseSourceDatanodes(BlockInfo block,
>   ...
>      if(priority != UnderReplicatedBlocks.QUEUE_HIGHEST_PRIORITY 
>           && !node.isDecommissionInProgress() 
>           && node.getNumberOfBlocksToBeReplicated() >= maxReplicationStreams)
>       {
>         continue; // already reached replication limit
>       }
>   ...
> {code}
> It may return not enough source DNs ( maybe 5), and failed to recover.
> A busy node should not be skiped if a block has highest risk/priority. The 
> issue is the striped block doesn't have priority.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to