[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15112820#comment-15112820
 ] 

Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-8999:
---------------------------------

In the failed test ({{TestDFSClientRetries}} e.g.) I saw the following stack 
trace:
{code}
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NotReplicatedYetException: Not 
replicated yet: /testIdempotentAllocateBlock
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirWriteFileOp.validateAddBlock(FSDirWriteFileOp.java:190)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FSNamesystem.java:2395)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNodeRpcServer.addBlock(NameNodeRpcServer.java:797)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSOutputStream.addBlock(DFSOutputStream.java:917)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DataStreamer.locateFollowingBlock(DataStreamer.java:1684)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DataStreamer.nextBlockOutputStream(DataStreamer.java:1494)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DataStreamer.run(DataStreamer.java:594)
{code}

Could you please check if this is caused by the patch, [~szetszwo]?

> Namenode need not wait for {{blockReceived}} for the last block before 
> completing a file.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8999
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8999
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey
>            Assignee: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze
>         Attachments: h8999_20151228.patch, h8999_20160106.patch, 
> h8999_20160106b.patch, h8999_20160106c.patch, h8999_20160111.patch, 
> h8999_20160113.patch, h8999_20160114.patch, h8999_20160121.patch, 
> h8999_20160121b.patch
>
>
> This comes out of a discussion in HDFS-8763. Pasting [~jingzhao]'s comment 
> from the jira:
> {quote}
> ...whether we need to let NameNode wait for all the block_received msgs to 
> announce the replica is safe. Looking into the code, now we have
>    # NameNode knows the DataNodes involved when initially setting up the 
> writing pipeline
>    # If any DataNode fails during the writing, client bumps the GS and 
> finally reports all the DataNodes included in the new pipeline to NameNode 
> through the updatePipeline RPC.
>    # When the client received the ack for the last packet of the block (and 
> before the client tries to close the file on NameNode), the replica has been 
> finalized in all the DataNodes.
> Then in this case, when NameNode receives the close request from the client, 
> the NameNode already knows the latest replicas for the block. Currently the 
> checkReplication call only counts in all the replicas that NN has already 
> received the block_received msg, but based on the above #2 and #3, it may be 
> safe to also count in all the replicas in the 
> BlockUnderConstructionFeature#replicas?
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to