[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15168286#comment-15168286
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9395:
---------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 13s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m
18s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m 15s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m 4s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 2s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
14s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 3m 3s
{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs in branch-2.7 has 1
extant Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 22s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 9s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m 7s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m 7s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 57s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 57s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 0m 25s
{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: patch generated 1 new +
360 unchanged - 3 fixed = 361 total (was 363) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 53s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
11s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 4123 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use
git apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 1m 41s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 110 line(s) with tabs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m 8s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 10s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 52s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 45m 2s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_72. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 41m 51s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} asflicense {color} | {color:red} 43m 9s
{color} | {color:red} Patch generated 80 ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 163m 6s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| JDK v1.8.0_72 Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestCrcCorruption |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestAppendSnapshotTruncate |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestRenameWithSnapshots |
| | hadoop.tools.TestJMXGet |
| JDK v1.7.0_95 Failed junit tests |
hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestRenameWithSnapshots |
| | hadoop.tools.TestJMXGet |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:c420dfe |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12790014/HDFS-9395-branch-2.7.002.patch
|
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-9395 |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux aa86d92a26d8 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | branch-2.7 / 8ceb9f3 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_95 |
| Multi-JDK versions | /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_72
/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_95 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| findbugs |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/artifact/patchprocess/branch-findbugs-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-warnings.html
|
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| whitespace |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace-eol.txt
|
| whitespace |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace-tabs.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.8.0_72.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.7.0_95.txt
|
| unit test logs |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.8.0_72.txt
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.7.0_95.txt
|
| JDK v1.7.0_95 Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/testReport/ |
| asflicense |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/artifact/patchprocess/patch-asflicense-problems.txt
|
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14617/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Make HDFS audit logging consistant
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-9395
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9395
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Kihwal Lee
> Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-9395-branch-2.7.001.patch,
> HDFS-9395-branch-2.7.002.patch, HDFS-9395.001.patch, HDFS-9395.002.patch,
> HDFS-9395.003.patch, HDFS-9395.004.patch, HDFS-9395.005.patch,
> HDFS-9395.006.patch, HDFS-9395.007.patch
>
>
> So, the big question here is what should go in the audit log? All failures,
> or just "permission denied" failures? Or, to put it a different way, if
> someone attempts to do something and it fails because a file doesn't exist,
> is that worth an audit log entry?
> We are currently inconsistent on this point. For example, concat,
> getContentSummary, addCacheDirective, and setErasureEncodingPolicy create an
> audit log entry for all failures, but setOwner, delete, and setAclEntries
> attempt to only create an entry for AccessControlException-based failures.
> There are a few operations, like allowSnapshot, disallowSnapshot, and
> startRollingUpgrade that never create audit log failure entries at all. They
> simply log nothing for any failure, and log success for a successful
> operation.
> So to summarize, different HDFS operations currently fall into 3 categories:
> 1. audit-log all failures
> 2. audit-log only AccessControlException failures
> 3. never audit-log failures
> Which category is right? And how can we fix the inconsistency
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
