[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15213861#comment-15213861
]
Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-9918:
---------------------------------
Thanks for the update Rakesh. I'm still working on the review but 2 questions
for you:
# {{Integer blkIndex = Integer.valueOf(blkIndices[indexPos]);}} Any reason to
use {{Integer}} instead of simply using {{int}}?
# In {{FSNamesystem#getBlockLocations}}, shouldn't we also handle the last
located block in the striped format?
{code}
// lastBlock is not part of getLocatedBlocks(), might need to sort it too
LocatedBlock lastBlock = blocks.getLastLocatedBlock();
if (lastBlock != null) {
ArrayList<LocatedBlock> lastBlockList = Lists.newArrayList(lastBlock);
blockManager.getDatanodeManager().sortLocatedBlocks(
clientMachine, lastBlockList);
}
}
{code}
> Erasure Coding: Sort located striped blocks based on decommissioned states
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-9918
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9918
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Rakesh R
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Attachments: HDFS-9918-001.patch, HDFS-9918-002.patch,
> HDFS-9918-003.patch
>
>
> This jira is a follow-on work of HDFS-8786, where we do decommissioning of
> datanodes having striped blocks.
> Now, after decommissioning it requires to change the ordering of the storage
> list so that the decommissioned datanodes should only be last node in list.
> For example, assume we have a block group with storage list:-
> d0, d1, d2, d3, d4, d5, d6, d7, d8, d9
> mapping to indices
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 2
> Here the internal block b2 is duplicated, locating in d2 and d9. If d2 is a
> decommissioning node then should switch d2 and d9 in the storage list.
> Thanks [~jingzhao] for the
> [discussions|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8786?focusedCommentId=15180415&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15180415]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)