[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15220759#comment-15220759
 ] 

Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-9427:
-------------------------------------

I posted patch v005 your comments, thanks [~xiaochen] for review. Here's 
mapping in the following.

I intentionally have 9820 being not strictly contiguous with other NN ports in 
a sense people easily remember 9820 as they are more familiar with 8020 thanks 
to [~arpiagariu] pointed me based on such a spirit.

I didn't see any 50070 reference in CommandsManual.md, which's already fixed in 
the patches.

Namenode ports 
---------------- 
50470 --> 9871
50070 --> 9870
8020   --> 9820

Secondary NN ports 
--------------- 
50091 --> 9869
50090 --> 9868

Datanode ports 
--------------- 
50020 --> 9867
50010 --> 9866
50475 --> 9865
50075 --> 9864


> HDFS should not default to ephemeral ports
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9427
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9427
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: datanode, hdfs-client, namenode
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Arpit Agarwal
>            Assignee: Xiaobing Zhou
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: Incompatible
>         Attachments: HDFS-9427.000.patch, HDFS-9427.001.patch, 
> HDFS-9427.002.patch, HDFS-9427.003.patch, HDFS-9427.004.patch, 
> HDFS-9427.005.patch
>
>
> HDFS defaults to ephemeral ports for the some HTTP/RPC endpoints. This can 
> cause bind exceptions on service startup if the port is in use.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to