[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15238756#comment-15238756
 ] 

Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HDFS-3702:
-------------------------------------------

Suppose we find that the CreateFlag.NO_LOCAL_WRITE is bad.  How do we remove 
it, i.e. what is the procedure to remove it?  I believe we cannot simply remove 
it since it probably will break HBASE compilation.

Another possible case: suppose that we find the disfavorNodes feature is very 
useful later on.  How do we add it?

> ..., lets do whatever proofing of the feature is needed here as part of this 
> issue and just get it done. ...

It seems that the "whatever proofing" is to let the community try the features 
for a period of time.  Then, we may add it to the FileSystem API.

> Add an option for NOT writing the blocks locally if there is a datanode on 
> the same box as the client
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3702
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3702
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: hdfs-client
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.1
>            Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>            Assignee: Lei (Eddy) Xu
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: BB2015-05-TBR
>         Attachments: HDFS-3702.000.patch, HDFS-3702.001.patch, 
> HDFS-3702.002.patch, HDFS-3702.003.patch, HDFS-3702.004.patch, 
> HDFS-3702.005.patch, HDFS-3702.006.patch, HDFS-3702.007.patch, 
> HDFS-3702.008.patch, HDFS-3702.009.patch, HDFS-3702.010.patch, 
> HDFS-3702.011.patch, HDFS-3702_Design.pdf
>
>
> This is useful for Write-Ahead-Logs: these files are writen for recovery 
> only, and are not read when there are no failures.
> Taking HBase as an example, these files will be read only if the process that 
> wrote them (the 'HBase regionserver') dies. This will likely come from a 
> hardware failure, hence the corresponding datanode will be dead as well. So 
> we're writing 3 replicas, but in reality only 2 of them are really useful.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to