[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15239670#comment-15239670
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10232:
--------------------------------------
Some keys are still missing "ozone" as part of their name. Was that
intentional? e.g.
{code}
public static final String DFS_CONTAINER_LOCATION_RPC_ADDRESS_KEY =
"dfs.container.location.rpc-address";
public static final int DFS_CONTAINER_LOCATION_RPC_DEFAULT_PORT = 50200;
public static final String DFS_CONTAINER_LOCATION_RPC_ADDRESS_DEFAULT =
"0.0.0.0:" + DFS_CONTAINER_LOCATION_RPC_DEFAULT_PORT;
public static final String DFS_CONTAINER_LOCATION_RPC_BIND_HOST_KEY =
"dfs.storage.rpc-bind-host";
public static final String DFS_CONTAINER_LOCATION_HANDLER_COUNT_KEY =
"dfs.storage.handler.count";
public static final int DFS_STORAGE_HANDLER_COUNT_DEFAULT = 10;
{code}
> Ozone: Make config key naming consistent
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-10232
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10232
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Anu Engineer
> Assignee: Anu Engineer
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: HDFS-10232-HDFS-7240.001.patch
>
>
> We seem to use StorageHandler, ozone, Objectstore etc as prefix. We should
> pick one -- Ideally ozone and use that consistently as the prefix for the
> ozone config management.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
