[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15332162#comment-15332162
]
Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-10407:
----------------------------------
Thanks for the work Rakesh. This is actually a pretty tricky one. I posted a
[comment |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7955?focusedCommentId=15151311&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15151311]
on the parent JIRA previously. In {{CorruptReplica}}, the "replica" means a
physically stored block replica, and "redundancy" doesn't seem to be a good
replacement here. The only solution I can think of, is to enhance documentation
so that developers and users understand EC internal blocks are a special form
of replicas. But please LMK if you have alternative proposals.
> Erasure Coding: Rename CorruptReplicasMap to CorruptRedundancyMap in
> BlockManager to more generic
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-10407
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10407
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: namenode
> Reporter: Rakesh R
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Attachments: HDFS-10407-00.patch, HDFS-10407-01.patch,
> HDFS-10407-02.patch
>
>
> The idea of this jira is to rename the following entity in BlockManager,
> - {{CorruptReplicasMap}} to {{CorruptRedundancyMap}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
