[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15336938#comment-15336938
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-6440:
----------------------------------
HDFS-10536 got filed. I just looked at the edit log tailor change alone and saw
multiple potential issues. I will file jiras for what I can spot, but it looks
like this needs a lot more testing and hardening. If bringing this to branch-2
will facilitate its maturing process, I am for it. But I expect it will entail
a lot of work. If there are enough people who are interested in this feature,
may be we can move forward.
> Support more than 2 NameNodes
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6440
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6440
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: auto-failover, ha, namenode
> Affects Versions: 2.4.0
> Reporter: Jesse Yates
> Assignee: Jesse Yates
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: Multiple-Standby-NameNodes_V1.pdf,
> hdfs-6440-cdh-4.5-full.patch, hdfs-6440-trunk-v1.patch,
> hdfs-6440-trunk-v1.patch, hdfs-6440-trunk-v3.patch, hdfs-6440-trunk-v4.patch,
> hdfs-6440-trunk-v5.patch, hdfs-6440-trunk-v6.patch, hdfs-6440-trunk-v7.patch,
> hdfs-6440-trunk-v8.patch, hdfs-multiple-snn-trunk-v0.patch
>
>
> Most of the work is already done to support more than 2 NameNodes (one
> active, one standby). This would be the last bit to support running multiple
> _standby_ NameNodes; one of the standbys should be available for fail-over.
> Mostly, this is a matter of updating how we parse configurations, some
> complexity around managing the checkpointing, and updating a whole lot of
> tests.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
