[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arpit Agarwal updated HDFS-10437:
---------------------------------
    Attachment: HDFS-10437.03.patch

Thanks for the reviews [~xiaobingo], [~cnauroth].

Yes the initial length makes little sense for a set construction, it was 
inadvertently left in the test case. Thanks for catching it!

Attaching a v3 patch to fix that. The remaining checkstyle issues are due to 
following the style of the original sources. I will commit this shortly.

> ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10437
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>            Assignee: Arpit Agarwal
>         Attachments: HDFS-10437.01.patch, HDFS-10437.02.patch, 
> HDFS-10437.03.patch
>
>
> The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security 
> policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface.  {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is 
> not listed currently.  This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality 
> is not working correctly in secured clusters.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to