[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Akira Ajisaka updated HDFS-10589:
---------------------------------
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Description:
Javadoc for HAState#HAState() contains @param name, but this constructor
doesn't has the parameter, HAState#setStateInternal() has the same problem, and
the annotation is not quite accurate, which is confusing for beginners.
So I made a simple fix.
was:
Javadoc for HAState#HAState()) contains @param name, but this constructor
doesn't has the parameter, HAState#setStateInternal() has the same problem, and
the annotation is not quite accurate, which is confusing for beginners.
So I made a simple fix.
Summary: Javadoc for HAState#HAState and HAState#setStateInternal
contains non-existent params (was: Javadoc for HAState#HAState() and
HAState#setStateInternal() contains non-exsitent params)
> Javadoc for HAState#HAState and HAState#setStateInternal contains
> non-existent params
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-10589
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10589
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation, hdfs
> Affects Versions: 2.8.0
> Environment: centos6.5 x64
> hadoop 2.8.0
> Reporter: shenyinjie
> Assignee: shenyinjie
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HDFS-10589.patch, HDFS-10589_1.patch
>
>
> Javadoc for HAState#HAState() contains @param name, but this constructor
> doesn't has the parameter, HAState#setStateInternal() has the same problem,
> and the annotation is not quite accurate, which is confusing for beginners.
> So I made a simple fix.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
