[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15419682#comment-15419682
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HDFS-10757:
---------------------------------------------
[~asuresh], thanks for explaining the context.
In this context it works because the server has a login user that is stored
as the actualUgi and that is the one always needed, but in some other scenarios
as in HADOOP-13381 the actualUgi becomes incorrect.
Many servers, that are processing an incoming request that was authenticated
via proxy mechanism, setup a proxy-UGI with a real user without credentials,
because the credentials of the real-user are not really available on the
server. Therefore, the proxy-ugi is relevant for real authentication only in
the context of a client. The proxyUgi setup by the server in this context
should not be propagated for further calls to other services. That means a new
proxy user should be explicitly setup to make further calls.
Suppose a general flow goes like this: (===> denotes a remote call)
client1 ====> Server1 (Hive, Oozie) Authenticates and creates ugi1---->
Server1 Processes ---> Server1 creates client2 to read encrypted data ===>
Server2 (NN or KMS)
When Server1 authenticates client1 it creates a ugi1 (which may be a proxy ugi)
to preserve the context in which authentication of client1 was performed. Now
when Sever1 instantiates a client2 to make a call to Server2 it should not use
ugi1 because the authentication context in ugi1 is not relevant for this call.
In my opinion a new ugi2 should be explicitly setup, which has the right
credentials.
> KMSClientProvider combined with KeyProviderCache can result in wrong UGI
> being used
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-10757
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10757
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Priority: Critical
>
> ClientContext::get gets the context from CACHE via a config setting based
> name, then KeyProviderCache stored in ClientContext gets the key provider
> cached by URI from the configuration, too. These would return the same
> KeyProvider regardless of current UGI.
> KMSClientProvider caches the UGI (actualUgi) in ctor; that means in
> particular that all the users of DFS with KMSClientProvider in a process will
> get the KMS token (along with other credentials) of the first user, via the
> above cache.
> Either KMSClientProvider shouldn't store the UGI, or one of the caches should
> be UGI-aware, like the FS object cache.
> Side note: the comment in createConnection that purports to handle the
> different UGI doesn't seem to cover what it says it covers. In our case, we
> have two unrelated UGIs with no auth (createRemoteUser) with bunch of tokens,
> including a KMS token, added.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
