[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15435124#comment-15435124
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-10763:
-----------------------------------
The one thing I had to do in the latest patch for branch-2.7 was to maintain
whatever the snapshot code was doing against deleted files in snapshots. If it
leaks UC features, it will continue to leak. If they don't, there will be no
leak with the patch either. So I think it is safe for branch-2.6 as well.
> Open files can leak permanently due to inconsistent lease update
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-10763
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10763
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.7.3, 2.6.4
> Reporter: Kihwal Lee
> Assignee: Kihwal Lee
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.7.4, 3.0.0-alpha2
>
> Attachments: HDFS-10763.br27.patch,
> HDFS-10763.branch-2.7.supplement.patch, HDFS-10763.branch-2.7.v2.patch,
> HDFS-10763.patch
>
>
> This can heppen during {{commitBlockSynchronization()}} or a client gives up
> on closing a file after retries.
> From {{finalizeINodeFileUnderConstruction()}}, the lease is removed first and
> then the inode is turned into the closed state. But if any block is not in
> COMPLETE state,
> {{INodeFile#assertAllBlocksComplete()}} will throw an exception. This will
> cause the lease is removed from the lease manager, but not from the inode.
> Since the lease manager does not have a lease for the file, no lease recovery
> will happen for this file. Moreover, this broken state is persisted and
> reconstructed through saving and loading of fsimage. Since no replication is
> scheduled for the blocks for the file, this can cause a data loss and also
> block decommissioning of datanode.
> The lease cannot be manually recovered either. It fails with
> {noformat}
> ...AlreadyBeingCreatedException): Failed to RECOVER_LEASE /xyz/xyz for user1
> on
> 0.0.0.1 because the file is under construction but no leases found.
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.recoverLeaseInternal(FSNamesystem.java:2950)
> ...
> {noformat}
> When a client retries {{close()}}, the same inconsistent state is created,
> but it can work in the next time since {{checkLease()}} only looks at the
> inode, not the lease manager in this case. The close behavior is different if
> HDFS-8999 is activated by setting
> {{dfs.namenode.file.close.num-committed-allowed}} to 1 (unlikely) or 2
> (never).
> In principle, the under-construction feature of an inode and the lease in the
> lease manager should never go out of sync. The fix involves two parts.
> 1) Prevent inconsistent lease updates. We can achieve this by calling
> {{removeLease()}} after checking the block state.
> 2) Avoid reconstructing inconsistent lease states from a fsimage. 1) alone
> does not correct the existing inconsistencies surviving through fsimages.
> This can be done during fsimage loading time by making sure a corresponding
> lease exists for each inode that are with the underconstruction feature.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
