[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15452877#comment-15452877
 ] 

Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10742:
--------------------------------------

Thanks [~vagarychen]. The change lgtm. A few minor comments:
# The InstrumentedLock class javadoc refers to LockChecker. 
# Missing Javadoc for InstrumentedLock constructor.
# We should add a unit test for InstrumentedLock, similar to the one for 
AutoCloseableLock.

Couple of comments that can be handled in a separate Jira:
# InstrumentedLock should not extend the concrete class AutoCloseableLock. We 
could make AutoCloseableLock an interface.
# The thresholds in FsDatasetImpl constructor should probably be configurable. 
We could use the same config key being introduced by HDFS-10713.

> Measurement of lock held time in FsDatasetImpl
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10742
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10742
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>            Reporter: Chen Liang
>            Assignee: Chen Liang
>         Attachments: HDFS-10742.001.patch, HDFS-10742.002.patch, 
> HDFS-10742.003.patch, HDFS-10742.004.patch, HDFS-10742.005.patch, 
> HDFS-10742.006.patch, HDFS-10742.007.patch, HDFS-10742.008.patch, 
> HDFS-10742.009.patch, HDFS-10742.010.patch
>
>
> This JIRA proposes to measure the time the of lock of {{FsDatasetImpl}} is 
> held by a thread. Doing so will allow us to measure lock statistics.
> This can be done by extending the {{AutoCloseableLock}} lock object in 
> {{FsDatasetImpl}}. In the future we can also consider replacing the lock with 
> a read-write lock.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to