[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Erik Krogen updated HDFS-10896:
-------------------------------
    Attachment: HDFS-10896.004.patch

After looking at HDFS-5239 it turns out the lack of documentation for 
{{dfs.namenode.fslock.fair}} was intentional. Attaching v004 patch which leaves 
it undocumented. 

> Move lock logging logic from FSNamesystem into FSNamesystemLock
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10896
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10896
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: Erik Krogen
>            Assignee: Erik Krogen
>              Labels: logging, namenode
>         Attachments: HDFS-10896.000.patch, HDFS-10896.001.patch, 
> HDFS-10896.002.patch, HDFS-10896.003.patch, HDFS-10896.004.patch
>
>
> There are a number of tickets (HDFS-10742, HDFS-10817, HDFS-10713, this 
> subtask's story HDFS-10475) which are adding/improving logging/metrics around 
> the {{FSNamesystemLock}}. All of this is done in {{FSNamesystem}} right now, 
> which is polluting the namesystem with ThreadLocal variables, timing 
> counters, etc. which are only relevant to the lock itself and the number of 
> these increases as the logging/metrics become more sophisticated. It would be 
> best to move these all into FSNamesystemLock to keep the metrics/logging tied 
> directly to the item of interest. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to