[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15622404#comment-15622404
 ] 

Yiqun Lin commented on HDFS-10499:
----------------------------------

Hi [~anu], I am ready to work on this. I have looked into this, I think one 
reason is that sometimes the block report haven't been reported to namenode and 
then the value {{BytesWithFutureGenerationStamps}} of future block will be 0. 
The line {{waitTil(TimeUnit.SECONDS.toMillis(SCAN_WAIT));}} can't gurantee 
that. Let me know if you are also working on this, Thanks!

> Intermittent test failure 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestNameNodeMetadataConsistency.testGenerationStampInFuture
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10499
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10499
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: namenode, test
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1
>            Reporter: Hanisha Koneru
>            Assignee: Anu Engineer
>
> Per https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15646/testReport/, we 
> had the following failure. Local rerun is successful.
> Stack Trace:
> {panel}
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<17> but was:<0>
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
>       at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:743)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:118)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:555)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:542)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestNameNodeMetadataConsistency.testGenerationStampInFuture(TestNameNodeMetadataConsistency.java:113)
> {panel}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to