[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15716687#comment-15716687
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-11094:
-----------------------------------
bq. For the unit test, can we set a very large heartbeat interval in
configuration, and check the active NN is not null after
cluster.waitForActive()?
I think the existing tests are quite adequate. I understand that a full-blown
mini cluster is sometimes needed to test the distributed file system. However,
we should avoid adding such end-to-end tests if it is possible to have
reasonable unit tests.
> Send back HAState along with NamespaceInfo during a versionRequest as an
> optional parameter
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-11094
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11094
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: datanode
> Reporter: Eric Badger
> Assignee: Eric Badger
> Attachments: HDFS-11094.001.patch, HDFS-11094.002.patch,
> HDFS-11094.003.patch, HDFS-11094.004.patch, HDFS-11094.005.patch,
> HDFS-11094.006.patch, HDFS-11094.007.patch, HDFS-11094.008.patch,
> HDFS-11094.009.patch
>
>
> The datanode should know which NN is active when it is connecting/registering
> to the NN. Currently, it only figures this out during its first (and
> subsequent) heartbeat(s) and so there is a period of time where the datanode
> is alive and registered, but can't actually do anything because it doesn't
> know which NN is active. A byproduct of this is that the MiniDFSCluster will
> become active before it knows what NN is active, which can lead to NPEs when
> calling getActiveNN().
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
