[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15724789#comment-15724789
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-6984:
-----------------------------------

Thanks for revving this Chris. I don't have a ton of background here, but my 
review:

* Can we split the Serializable stuff into a separate change? Changing booleans 
into Boolean objects is additional overhead, and combining these two changes 
makes it harder to review. Also, I am not a Java serialization expert, but IIUC 
maintaining compatibility is difficult, which means maybe people should just 
use PB anyway.
* The serialization loses the extra {{isEncrypted}} and 
{{FsPermission#getAclBit}} bits since it calls {{toShort}} rather than 
{{toExtendedShort}}. Seems like we should save these, though the fact we pack 
these bits into FsPermission is an internal implementation detail. Adding new 
booleans to FileStatus might break cross-serialization with HdfsFileStatus 
though. What is the usecase for cross-serialization?
* Could use some more extensive unit tests that test the default values and 
error conditions with the shorts.
* Test nit: please also avoid the wildcard import.

Regarding Steve's comment on bounds checking, PB by default has a 64MB max 
message size. We could use that as a reasonable upper-bound on the size of a 
FileStatus.

> In Hadoop 3, make FileStatus serialize itself via protobuf
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6984
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6984
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1
>            Reporter: Colin P. McCabe
>            Assignee: Colin P. McCabe
>              Labels: BB2015-05-TBR
>         Attachments: HDFS-6984.001.patch, HDFS-6984.002.patch, 
> HDFS-6984.003.patch
>
>
> FileStatus was a Writable in Hadoop 2 and earlier.  Originally, we used this 
> to serialize it and send it over the wire.  But in Hadoop 2 and later, we 
> have the protobuf {{HdfsFileStatusProto}} which serves to serialize this 
> information.  The protobuf form is preferable, since it allows us to add new 
> fields in a backwards-compatible way.  Another issue is that already a lot of 
> subclasses of FileStatus don't override the Writable methods of the 
> superclass, breaking the interface contract that read(status.write) should be 
> equal to the original status.
> In Hadoop 3, we should just make FileStatus serialize itself via protobuf so 
> that we don't have to deal with these issues.  It's probably too late to do 
> this in Hadoop 2, since user code may be relying on the existing FileStatus 
> serialization there.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to