[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15730127#comment-15730127
]
Anu Engineer commented on HDFS-11217:
-------------------------------------
[~andrew.wang] Thanks for the explanation. Makes sense. But the original JIRA
mentions
bq. Adding methods to interfaces breaks the user classes which implement them
But I agree that user classes should not be implementing them. I am okay with
making these private.
> Make some JMX interfaces private
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-11217
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11217
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Akira Ajisaka
> Assignee: Jagadesh Kiran N
>
> NameNodeMXBean, NameNodeStatusMXBean, DataNodeMXBean are annotated
> {{@Public}} and {{@Stable}}, but some methods are being added. For example,
> DataNodeMXBean.getBPServiceActorInfo was added between branch-2.7.3 and
> branch-2.8. Adding methods to interfaces breaks the user classes which
> implement them, so we should make them {{@Private}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
