[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15815597#comment-15815597
]
John Zhuge commented on HDFS-10860:
-----------------------------------
Patch 005 does not suffer from the issue of HADOOP-13961:
Testing #1 existing source tree
# rm -fr ~/.m2/repository/
# ( cd hadoop-maven-plugins/ && mvn install )
# mvn clean
# mvn install -DskipTests -Dmaven.javadoc.skip -Pnative
Testing #2 new source tree
# rm -fr ~/.m2/repository/
# mvn install -DskipTests -Dmaven.javadoc.skip -Pnative
> Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-10860
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: httpfs
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: John Zhuge
> Assignee: John Zhuge
> Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch,
> HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch
>
>
> The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are
> other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the
> following reasons:
> * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet
> Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would
> require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}.
> * Well established.
> * Good performance and scalability.
> Other alternatives:
> * Jersey + Grizzly
> * Tomcat 8
> Your opinions will be greatly appreciated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
