[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15945392#comment-15945392
 ] 

Hudson commented on HDFS-11577:
-------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #11482 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/11482/])
HDFS-11577. Combine the old and the new chooseRandom for better (yqlin: rev 
6b0933643835d7696ced011cfdb8b74f63022e8b)
* (edit) 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/net/TestDFSNetworkTopology.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/net/DFSNetworkTopology.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/NetworkTopology.java


> Combine the old and the new chooseRandom for better performance
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-11577
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11577
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: Chen Liang
>            Assignee: Chen Liang
>             Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha3
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-11577.001.patch, HDFS-11577.002.patch, 
> HDFS-11577.003.patch
>
>
> As discussed in HDFS-11535, this JIRA adds a new function combining both the 
> new and the old chooseRandom methods for better performance.
> More specifically, when choosing a random node with storage type requirement, 
> the combined method first tries the old method of blindly picking a random 
> node. If this node satisfies, it is returned. Otherwise, the new chooseRandom 
> is called, which guarantees to find a eligible node in one call (if there is 
> one at all).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to