[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15965212#comment-15965212
]
Anu Engineer commented on HDFS-11636:
-------------------------------------
There is a merge conflict with the top of the tree, can you please rebase this
patch if it is still valid.
> Ozone: TestContainerPlacement fails because of string mismatch in expected
> Message
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-11636
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11636
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ozone
> Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
> Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
> Attachments: HDFS-11636-HDFS-7240.001.patch
>
>
> TestContainerPlacement fails because of the following error.
> This happens because the error message in container Allocation was changed in
> HDFS-11620. Expected error message in the test needs to be rephrased to solve
> this issue.
> {code}
> Expected: (an instance of java.io.IOException and exception with message a
> string starting with "Unable to find enough nodes that meet the space
> requirement in healthy node set.")
> but: exception with message a string starting with "Unable to find
> enough nodes that meet the space requirement in healthy node set." message
> was "Unable to find enough nodes that meet the space requirement of
> 5368709120 bytes in healthy node set. Nodes required: 3 Found: 0"
> Stacktrace was: org.apache.hadoop.ozone.scm.exceptions.SCMException: Unable
> to find enough nodes that meet the space requirement of 5368709120 bytes in
> healthy node set. Nodes required: 3 Found: 0
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.ozone.scm.container.placement.algorithms.SCMCommonPolicy.chooseDatanodes(SCMCommonPolicy.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.ozone.scm.container.placement.algorithms.SCMContainerPlacementCapacity.chooseDatanodes(SCMContainerPlacementCapacity.java:95)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.ozone.scm.container.ContainerMapping.allocateContainer(ContainerMapping.java:220)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.ozone.scm.node.TestContainerPlacement.testContainerPlacementCapacity(TestContainerPlacement.java:182)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.junit.rules.ExpectedException$ExpectedExceptionStatement.evaluate(ExpectedException.java:168)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:264)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:124)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:200)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:865)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:832)
> at
> org.junit.rules.ExpectedException.handleException(ExpectedException.java:198)
> at
> org.junit.rules.ExpectedException.access$500(ExpectedException.java:85)
> at
> org.junit.rules.ExpectedException$ExpectedExceptionStatement.evaluate(ExpectedException.java:177)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:264)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:124)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:200)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]