[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15990559#comment-15990559
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-7541:
-------------------------------
Sure I can backport HDFS-9005, HDFS-9016 and HDFS-9922 to 2.8. Which 2.8
release do we want, 2.8.1 or 2.8.2? Pushing the feature to 2.7 requires much
more work though. Regarding the production quality, yes it has been pretty
reliable. The only feature we don't use in our production is HDFS-9005. We used
script-based configuration approach while the feature was developed and tested
and haven't spend time changing the configuration mechanism.
> Upgrade Domains in HDFS
> -----------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-7541
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7541
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ming Ma
> Assignee: Kihwal Lee
> Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HDFS-7541-2.patch, HDFS-7541.patch,
> SupportforfastHDFSdatanoderollingupgrade.pdf, UpgradeDomains_design_v2.pdf,
> UpgradeDomains_Design_v3.pdf
>
>
> Current HDFS DN rolling upgrade step requires sequential DN restart to
> minimize the impact on data availability and read/write operations. The side
> effect is longer upgrade duration for large clusters. This might be
> acceptable for DN JVM quick restart to update hadoop code/configuration.
> However, for OS upgrade that requires machine reboot, the overall upgrade
> duration will be too long if we continue to do sequential DN rolling restart.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
