[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993580#comment-15993580 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9922: --------------------------------- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 13m 57s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 9m 23s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 47s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.8.0_131 {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 43s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.7.0_121 {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 20s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 56s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 16s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 4s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 43s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.8.0_131 {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 4s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.7.0_121 {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_131 {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_121 {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 17s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_131 {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_121 {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 56m 45s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_121. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 31s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. {color} | | {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}150m 7s{color} | {color:black} {color} | \\ \\ || Reason || Tests || | JDK v1.7.0_121 Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestFsDatasetCache | | | hadoop.hdfs.TestClientProtocolForPipelineRecovery | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:5970e82 | | JIRA Issue | HDFS-9922 | | JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12866009/HDFS-9922.branch-2.8.001.patch | | Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit findbugs checkstyle | | uname | Linux 94628fcd32db 3.13.0-107-generic #154-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 20 09:57:27 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | | Build tool | maven | | Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh | | git revision | branch-2.8 / 305a9d8 | | Default Java | 1.7.0_121 | | Multi-JDK versions | /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_131 /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_121 | | findbugs | v3.0.0 | | unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/19270/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.7.0_121.txt | | JDK v1.7.0_121 Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/19270/testReport/ | | modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/19270/console | | Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org | This message was automatically generated. > Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when > there are decommissioned nodes > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-9922 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Chris Trezzo > Assignee: Chris Trezzo > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-alpha1 > > Attachments: HDFS-9922.branch-2.8.001.patch, > HDFS-9922-trunk-v1.patch, HDFS-9922-trunk-v2.patch, HDFS-9922-trunk-v3.patch, > HDFS-9922-trunk-v4.patch > > > When there are replicas of a block on a decommissioned node, > BlockPlacementStatusWithUpgradeDomain#isUpgradeDomainPolicySatisfied returns > false when it should return true. This is because numberOfReplicas is the > number of in-service replicas for the block and upgradeDomains.size() is the > number of upgrade domains across all replicas of the block. Specifically, we > hit this scenario when numberOfReplicas is equal to upgradeDomainFactor and > upgradeDomains.size() is greater than numberOfReplicas. > {code} > private boolean isUpgradeDomainPolicySatisfied() { > if (numberOfReplicas <= upgradeDomainFactor) { > return (numberOfReplicas == upgradeDomains.size()); > } else { > return upgradeDomains.size() >= upgradeDomainFactor; > } > } > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org