[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16061269#comment-16061269
]
Elek, Marton commented on HDFS-12023:
-------------------------------------
Thanks the hint, TestConfigurationFieldsBase is exactly what I needed. Updated
the patch.
It also shows if the defaults are different:
I increased the OZONE_SCM_HANDLER_COUNT_DEFAULT to 20 (as it was defined in
ozone-default)
But I couldn't decide if the handler type should be fixed or not. (As I know
the local is only for testing)
{code}
ozone-default.xml has 1 properties that do not match the default Config value
XML Property: ozone.handler.type
XML Value: local
Config Name: OZONE_HANDLER_TYPE_DEFAULT
Config Value: distributed
{code}
> Ozone: test if all the configuration keys documented in ozone-defaults.xml
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-12023
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12023
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ozone
> Reporter: Elek, Marton
> Assignee: Elek, Marton
> Labels: test
> Attachments: HDFS-12023-HDFS-7240.001.patch,
> HDFS-12023-HDFS-7240.002.patch
>
>
> HDFS-11990 added the missing configuration entries the ozone-defaults.xml
> This patch contains a unit test which tests if all the configuration keys are
> still documented.
> (constant fields of the specific configuration classes which ends with _KEY
> should be part of the defaults.xml).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
