[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16067315#comment-16067315
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-12044:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  5s{color} 
| {color:red} HDFS-12044 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-12044 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12874965/HDFS-12044.02.patch |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20083/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Mismatch between BlockManager#maxReplicatioStreams and 
> ErasureCodingWorker.stripedReconstructionPool pool size causes slow and burst 
> recovery. 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-12044
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12044
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: erasure-coding
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha3
>            Reporter: Lei (Eddy) Xu
>            Assignee: Lei (Eddy) Xu
>         Attachments: HDFS-12044.00.patch, HDFS-12044.01.patch, 
> HDFS-12044.02.patch
>
>
> {{ErasureCodingWorker#stripedReconstructionPool}} is with {{corePoolSize=2}} 
> and {{maxPoolSize=8}} as default. And it rejects more tasks if the queue is 
> full.
> When {{BlockManager#maxReplicationStream}} is larger than 
> {{ErasureCodingWorker#stripedReconstructionPool#corePoolSize/maxPoolSize}}, 
> for example, {{maxReplicationStream=20}} and {{corePoolSize=2 , 
> maxPoolSize=8}}.  Meanwhile, NN sends up to {{maxTransfer}} reconstruction 
> tasks to DN for each heartbeat, and it is calculated in {{FSNamesystem}}:
> {code}
> final int maxTransfer = blockManager.getMaxReplicationStreams() - 
> xmitsInProgress;
> {code}
> However, at any giving time, 
> {{{ErasureCodingWorker#stripedReconstructionPool}} takes 2 {{xmitInProcess}}. 
> So for each heartbeat in 3s, NN will send about {{20-2 = 18}} reconstruction 
> tasks to the DN, and DN throw away most of them if there were 8 tasks in the 
> queue already. So NN needs to take longer to re-consider these blocks were 
> under-replicated to schedule new tasks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to