[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16135011#comment-16135011
 ] 

Rakesh R commented on HDFS-12225:
---------------------------------

I could see the possibility of NPE due to null {{rootId}} and shutting down SPS 
thread, which results in failure. How about changing {{Long}} object to 
{{long}} primitive and can avoid {{rootId.longValue()}} ?
{code}
public static class SatisfyTrackInfo {
    private long rootId;
    private long trackId;
{code}



> [SPS]: Optimize extended attributes for tracking SPS movements
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-12225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12225
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: datanode, namenode
>            Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>            Assignee: Surendra Singh Lilhore
>         Attachments: HDFS-12225-HDFS-10285-01.patch, 
> HDFS-12225-HDFS-10285-02.patch, HDFS-12225-HDFS-10285-03.patch, 
> HDFS-12225-HDFS-10285-04.patch, HDFS-12225-HDFS-10285-05.patch, 
> HDFS-12225-HDFS-10285-06.patch
>
>
> We have discussed to optimize number extended attributes and asked to report 
> separate JIRA while implementing [HDFS-11150 | 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11150?focusedCommentId=15766127&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15766127]
> This is the JIRA to track that work 
> For the context, comment copied from HDFS-11150
> {quote}
> [~yuanbo] wrote : I've tried that before. There is an issue here if we only 
> mark the directory. When recovering from FsImage, the InodeMap isn't built 
> up, so we don't know the sub-inode of a given inode, in the end, We cannot 
> add these inodes to movement queue in FSDirectory#addToInodeMap, any 
> thoughts?{quote}
> {quote}
> [~umamaheswararao] wrote: I got what you are saying. Ok for simplicity we can 
> add for all Inodes now. For this to handle 100%, we may need intermittent 
> processing, like first we should add them to some intermittentList while 
> loading fsImage, once fully loaded and when starting active services, we 
> should process that list and do required stuff. But it would add some 
> additional complexity may be. Let's do with all file inodes now and we can 
> revisit later if it is really creating issues. How about you raise a JIRA for 
> it and think to optimize separately?
> {quote}
> {quote}
> [~andrew.wang] wrote in HDFS-10285 merge time review comment : HDFS-10899 
> also the cursor of the iterator in the EZ root xattr to track progress and 
> handle restarts. I wonder if we can do something similar here to avoid having 
> an xattr-per-file being moved.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to