[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16177425#comment-16177425
 ] 

Marcelo Vanzin commented on HDFS-12534:
---------------------------------------

bq. Are you sure we can split within a single S3 file?

Location != split. You can have x splits all with the same location. I'm pretty 
sure reading from a single s3 file using FileInputFormat generates multiple 
tasks (one per "split"). You may want to look at how it does that, it might be 
all client-side based on some client-side configuration.

> Provide logical BlockLocations for EC files for better split calculation
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-12534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12534
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: erasure-coding
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-beta1
>            Reporter: Andrew Wang
>              Labels: hdfs-ec-3.0-must-do
>
> I talked to [~vanzin] and [~alex.behm] some more about split calculation with 
> EC. It turns out HDFS-12222 was resolved prematurely. Applications depend on 
> HDFS BlockLocation to understand where the split points are. The current 
> scheme of returning one BlockLocation per block group loses this information.
> We should change this to provide logical blocks. Divide the file length by 
> the block size and provide suitable BlockLocations to match, with virtual 
> offsets and lengths too.
> I'm not marking this as incompatible, since changing it this way would in 
> fact make it more compatible from the perspective of applications that are 
> scheduling against replicated files. Thus, it'd be good for beta1 if 
> possible, but okay for later too.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to