[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16197594#comment-16197594
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-12588:
----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 15m
25s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} shelldocs {color} | {color:blue} 3m
18s{color} | {color:blue} Shelldocs was not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} HDFS-7240 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 16m
50s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
6s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 45s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
4s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shellcheck {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} There were no new shellcheck issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 47s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}108m 23s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}181m 4s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailureReporting |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDirectoryScanner |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:71bbb86 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-12588 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12891088/HDFS-12588-HDFS-7240.003.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense mvnsite unit shellcheck shelldocs compile
javac javadoc mvninstall shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 5b9f65a9ecb2 3.13.0-119-generic #166-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 3
12:18:55 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | HDFS-7240 / d728102 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_144 |
| shellcheck | v0.4.6 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/21600/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/21600/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/21600/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Use GenericOptionsParser for scm and ksm daemon
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-12588
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12588
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: HDFS-7240
> Reporter: Elek, Marton
> Assignee: Elek, Marton
> Attachments: HDFS-12588-HDFS-7240.001.patch,
> HDFS-12588-HDFS-7240.002.patch, HDFS-12588-HDFS-7240.003.patch
>
>
> Most of the hadoop commands use the GenericOptionsParser to use some common
> CLI arguments (such as -conf or -D or -libjars to define configuration/modify
> configuration/modify classpath).
> I suggest to use the same common options to scm and ksm daemons as well, as:
> 1. It allows to use the existing cluster management tools/scripts as the
> daemons could be configured in the same way as namenode and datanode
> 2. It follows the convention from the hadoop common.
> 3. It's easier to develop from the IDE (I start the ksm/scm/datanode/namenode
> from intellij but I need to add the configuration to the classpath. With
> -conf I would able to use external configration.)
> I found one problem during the implementation. Until now we used `hdfs scm`
> command both for the daemon and the scm command line client. If there were no
> parameters the daemon is started, with parameters the cli is started. The
> help listed only the damon.
> The -conf (GenericOptionParser) could be used only if we separate the scm and
> scmcli commands. But any way, it's a more clean and visible if we have
> separated `hdfs scm` and `hdfs scmcli`.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
