[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16298099#comment-16298099
 ] 

Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-12943:
----------------------------------

Thanks [~csun], interesting results!

If I understand correctly, both your test and the Dynamometer test are more 
like trace-driven micro benchmarks, where a container issues a certain type of 
RPC at given timestamp. Chris was probably referring to a test job with "real 
code" like {{if !file_exists(path) then create_file(path)}}, where the blocking 
relationship between calls are miniced.

[~chris.douglas]: the "natural" increase of write traffic is an interesting 
question. I don't think the feature will increase the total amount of write 
RPCs (a given job will still issue that many writes overall). Writes within a 
job could become more bursty but the job itself will run for shorter. 
Statistically, the 1000s of jobs on the cluster would probably smooth out this 
increased burstiness.

> Consistent Reads from Standby Node
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-12943
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12943
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: hdfs
>            Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
>         Attachments: ConsistentReadsFromStandbyNode.pdf
>
>
> StandbyNode in HDFS is a replica of the active NameNode. The states of the 
> NameNodes are coordinated via the journal. It is natural to consider 
> StandbyNode as a read-only replica. As with any replicated distributed system 
> the problem of stale reads should be resolved. Our main goal is to provide 
> reads from standby in a consistent way in order to enable a wide range of 
> existing applications running on top of HDFS.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to