[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16317112#comment-16317112
 ] 

Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-12945:
------------------------------------

{{TestDataNodeVolumeFailureReporting}} seemed to fial before; it seems spurious 
to me but do you mind checking?
Otherwise +1 on [^HDFS-12945.002.patch] too.

> Switch to ClientProtocol instead of NamenodeProtocols in 
> NamenodeWebHdfsMethods
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-12945
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12945
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Wei Yan
>            Assignee: Wei Yan
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HDFS-12945.000.patch, HDFS-12945.001.patch, 
> HDFS-12945.002.patch
>
>
> In HDFS-12512 which is to add WebHDFS support to Router-based Federation, we 
> found it would be good to switch from NamenodeProtocols to ClientProtocol in 
> NamenodeWebHdfsMethods, to make code sharable between NameNode WebHDFS and 
> Router WebHDFS. Would like to get some feedbacks about this refactor, any 
> concerns?
> cc [~elgoiri] [~szetszwo] [~sanjay.radia]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to