[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16345983#comment-16345983
 ] 

Daryn Sharp commented on HDFS-10285:
------------------------------------

*StoragePolicySatisifier*
 Should {{handleException}} use a double-checked lock to avoid synchronization? 
 Unexpected exceptions should be a rarity, right?
 Speaking of which, it’s not safe to ignore all {{Throwable}} in the run loop!  
You have no idea if data structures are in a sane or consistent state.


 *FSTreeTraverser*
 I need to study this more but I have grave concerns this will work correctly 
in a mutating namesystem.  Ex. renames and deletes esp. in combination with 
snapshots. Looks like there's a chance it will go off in the weeds when 
backtracking out of a renamed directory.


 {{traverseDir}} may NPE if it's traversing a tree in a snapshot and one of the 
ancestors is deleted.


 Not sure why it's bothering to re-check permissions during the crawl.  The 
storage policy is inherited by the entire tree, regardless of whether the 
sub-contents are accessible.  The effect of this patch is the storage policy is 
enforced for all readable files, non-readable violate the new storage policy, 
new non-readable will conform to the new storage policy.  Very convoluted.  
Since new files will conform, should just process the entire tree.
  

> Storage Policy Satisfier in Namenode
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10285
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10285
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: datanode, namenode
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-10285
>            Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>            Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-00.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-01.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-02.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-03.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-04.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-05.patch, 
> HDFS-SPS-TestReport-20170708.pdf, SPS Modularization.pdf, 
> Storage-Policy-Satisfier-in-HDFS-June-20-2017.pdf, 
> Storage-Policy-Satisfier-in-HDFS-May10.pdf, 
> Storage-Policy-Satisfier-in-HDFS-Oct-26-2017.pdf
>
>
> Heterogeneous storage in HDFS introduced the concept of storage policy. These 
> policies can be set on directory/file to specify the user preference, where 
> to store the physical block. When user set the storage policy before writing 
> data, then the blocks could take advantage of storage policy preferences and 
> stores physical block accordingly. 
> If user set the storage policy after writing and completing the file, then 
> the blocks would have been written with default storage policy (nothing but 
> DISK). User has to run the ‘Mover tool’ explicitly by specifying all such 
> file names as a list. In some distributed system scenarios (ex: HBase) it 
> would be difficult to collect all the files and run the tool as different 
> nodes can write files separately and file can have different paths.
> Another scenarios is, when user rename the files from one effected storage 
> policy file (inherited policy from parent directory) to another storage 
> policy effected directory, it will not copy inherited storage policy from 
> source. So it will take effect from destination file/dir parent storage 
> policy. This rename operation is just a metadata change in Namenode. The 
> physical blocks still remain with source storage policy.
> So, Tracking all such business logic based file names could be difficult for 
> admins from distributed nodes(ex: region servers) and running the Mover tool. 
> Here the proposal is to provide an API from Namenode itself for trigger the 
> storage policy satisfaction. A Daemon thread inside Namenode should track 
> such calls and process to DN as movement commands. 
> Will post the detailed design thoughts document soon. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to