[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16397710#comment-16397710
 ] 

Wei Yan commented on HDFS-13215:
--------------------------------

{quote}I'm leaning towards having our own hdfs-rbf-site.xml.
{quote}
I'm ok with this approach. Will put a new diff to move RBF-related configs to a 
separte hdfs-rbf-default.xml. After we finish this jira, we can start revise 
hdfs-site.xml and scripts/docs to separate rbf-related configs to 
hdfs-rbf-site.xml. Sounds good?
{quote}We could pretty much just depend on hadoop-hdfs-client.
{quote}
This may be not easy, given that we tried to reuse as much code as possible 
from NameNode side...

> RBF: Move Router to its own module
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-13215
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13215
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>            Assignee: Wei Yan
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-13215.000.patch
>
>
> We are splitting the HDFS client code base and potentially Router-based 
> Federation is also independent enough to be in its own package.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to