[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang updated HDFS-9412:
----------------------------------
Release Note: Skip blocks with size below
dfs.balancer.getBlocks.min-block-size (default 10MB) when a balancer asks for a
list of blocks.
> getBlocks occupies FSLock and takes too long to complete
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-9412
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: balancer & mover, namenode
> Reporter: He Tianyi
> Assignee: He Tianyi
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.8.0, 2.7.4, 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HDFS-9412-branch-2.7.00.patch, HDFS-9412.0000.patch,
> HDFS-9412.0001.patch, HDFS-9412.0002.patch
>
>
> {{getBlocks}} in {{NameNodeRpcServer}} acquires a read lock then may take a
> long time to complete (probably several seconds, if number of blocks are too
> much).
> During this period, other threads attempting to acquire write lock will wait.
> In an extreme case, RPC handlers are occupied by one reader thread calling
> {{getBlocks}} and all other threads waiting for write lock, rpc server acts
> like hung. Unfortunately, this tends to happen in heavy loaded cluster, since
> read operations come and go fast (they do not need to wait), leaving write
> operations waiting.
> Looks like we can optimize this thing like DN block report did in past, by
> splitting the operation into smaller sub operations, and let other threads do
> their work between each sub operation. The whole result is returned at once,
> though (one thing different from DN block report).
> I am not sure whether this will work. Any better idea?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
