[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16517570#comment-16517570
 ] 

Elek, Marton commented on HDDS-177:
-----------------------------------

Finally the patch is proved to be good. We had a good run of the acceptance 
tests (including the new ozonefs tests):

https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-precommit-ozone-acceptance/18 (You can 
also check the end of the console output)

The dependency + the tab problems are also fixed in the latest patch (waiting 
for the jenkins)

> Create a releasable ozonefs artifact 
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-177
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-177
>             Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Ozone Filesystem
>            Reporter: Elek, Marton
>            Assignee: Elek, Marton
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.2.1
>
>         Attachments: HDDS-177.001.patch, HDDS-177.002.patch, 
> HDDS-177.003.patch, HDDS-177.004.patch, HDDS-177.005.patch, 
> HDDS-177.006.patch, HDDS-177.007.patch
>
>
> The current ozonefs implementaton is under hadoop-tools/hadoop-ozone and uses 
> the version of hadoop (3.2.0-SNAPSHOT currently) which is wrong.
> The other problem is that we have no single hadoop independent arfitact from 
> ozonefs which could be used with any hadoop version.
> In this patch I propose the following modification:
> * move hadoop-tools/hadoop-ozone to hadoop-ozone/ozonefs and use the hdds 
> version (0.2.1-SNAPSHOT)
> * Create a shaded artifact which includes all the required jar files to use 
> ozonefs (hdds/ozone client)
> * Create an ozonefs acceptance test to test it with the latest stable hadoop 
> version



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to