[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16576149#comment-16576149
 ] 

Ewan Higgs commented on HDFS-10285:
-----------------------------------

Hi all,
Based on [~umamaheswararao]'s proposal, where are we? As we waiting on more 
code for HDFS-10285 to remove the internal SPS? Or is this in a position for 
people to vote to move forward? (If I were to guess, it will be merged after 
3.2 is released).

Thanks

> Storage Policy Satisfier in HDFS
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10285
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10285
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: datanode, namenode
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-10285
>            Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>            Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS SPS Test Report-31July2018-v1.pdf, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-00.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-01.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-02.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-03.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-04.patch, 
> HDFS-10285-consolidated-merge-patch-05.patch, 
> HDFS-SPS-TestReport-20170708.pdf, SPS Modularization.pdf, 
> Storage-Policy-Satisfier-in-HDFS-June-20-2017.pdf, 
> Storage-Policy-Satisfier-in-HDFS-May10.pdf, 
> Storage-Policy-Satisfier-in-HDFS-Oct-26-2017.pdf
>
>
> Heterogeneous storage in HDFS introduced the concept of storage policy. These 
> policies can be set on directory/file to specify the user preference, where 
> to store the physical block. When user set the storage policy before writing 
> data, then the blocks could take advantage of storage policy preferences and 
> stores physical block accordingly. 
> If user set the storage policy after writing and completing the file, then 
> the blocks would have been written with default storage policy (nothing but 
> DISK). User has to run the ‘Mover tool’ explicitly by specifying all such 
> file names as a list. In some distributed system scenarios (ex: HBase) it 
> would be difficult to collect all the files and run the tool as different 
> nodes can write files separately and file can have different paths.
> Another scenarios is, when user rename the files from one effected storage 
> policy file (inherited policy from parent directory) to another storage 
> policy effected directory, it will not copy inherited storage policy from 
> source. So it will take effect from destination file/dir parent storage 
> policy. This rename operation is just a metadata change in Namenode. The 
> physical blocks still remain with source storage policy.
> So, Tracking all such business logic based file names could be difficult for 
> admins from distributed nodes(ex: region servers) and running the Mover tool. 
> Here the proposal is to provide an API from Namenode itself for trigger the 
> storage policy satisfaction. A Daemon thread inside Namenode should track 
> such calls and process to DN as movement commands. 
> Will post the detailed design thoughts document soon. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to