[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16610138#comment-16610138
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-13768:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
19s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m 
32s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m  
1s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
58s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m  
7s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m 12s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  2m  
4s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
50s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
14s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m  
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  1m  
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
0m 57s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch 
generated 11 new + 466 unchanged - 0 fixed = 477 total (was 466) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch 6 line(s) with tabs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
2s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shadedclient {color} | {color:red} 13m 
33s{color} | {color:red} patch has errors when building and testing our client 
artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red}  2m 
30s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs generated 1 new + 0 
unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}108m 32s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
30s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}169m 17s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| FindBugs | module:hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
|  |  Possible doublecheck on 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.BlockPoolSlice.forkJoinPool
 in new 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.BlockPoolSlice(String, 
FsVolumeImpl, File, Configuration, Timer)  At BlockPoolSlice.java:new 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.BlockPoolSlice(String, 
FsVolumeImpl, File, Configuration, Timer)  At BlockPoolSlice.java:[lines 
173-175] |
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestLeaseRecovery2 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeMultipleRegistrations |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestHAAppend |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestMaintenanceState |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:ba1ab08 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-13768 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12939198/HDFS-13768.01.patch |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  xml  |
| uname | Linux 0c54b1d662f0 3.13.0-153-generic #203-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 14 
08:52:28 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 987d819 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_181 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/25030/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
 |
| whitespace | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/25030/artifact/out/whitespace-tabs.txt
 |
| findbugs | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/25030/artifact/out/new-findbugs-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.html
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/25030/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/25030/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 3249 (vs. ulimit of 10000) |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/25030/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



>  Adding replicas to volume map makes DataNode start slowly 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-13768
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13768
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>            Reporter: Yiqun Lin
>            Assignee: Surendra Singh Lilhore
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-13768.01.patch, HDFS-13768.patch
>
>
> We find DN starting so slowly when rolling upgrade our cluster. When we 
> restart DNs, the DNs start so slowly and not register to NN immediately. And 
> this cause a lots of following error:
> {noformat}
> DataXceiver error processing WRITE_BLOCK operation  src: /xx.xx.xx.xx:64360 
> dst: /xx.xx.xx.xx:50010
> java.io.IOException: Not ready to serve the block pool, 
> BP-1508644862-xx.xx.xx.xx-1493781183457.
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.checkAndWaitForBP(DataXceiver.java:1290)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.checkAccess(DataXceiver.java:1298)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:630)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.datatransfer.Receiver.opWriteBlock(Receiver.java:169)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.datatransfer.Receiver.processOp(Receiver.java:106)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:246)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {noformat}
> Looking into the logic of DN startup, it will do the initial block pool 
> operation before the registration. And during initializing block pool 
> operation, we found the adding replicas to volume map is the most expensive 
> operation.  Related log:
> {noformat}
> 2018-07-26 10:46:23,771 INFO [Thread-105] 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Time to 
> add replicas to map for block pool BP-1508644862-xx.xx.xx.xx-1493781183457 on 
> volume /home/hard_disk/1/dfs/dn/current: 242722ms
> 2018-07-26 10:46:26,231 INFO [Thread-109] 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Time to 
> add replicas to map for block pool BP-1508644862-xx.xx.xx.xx-1493781183457 on 
> volume /home/hard_disk/5/dfs/dn/current: 245182ms
> 2018-07-26 10:46:32,146 INFO [Thread-112] 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Time to 
> add replicas to map for block pool BP-1508644862-xx.xx.xx.xx-1493781183457 on 
> volume /home/hard_disk/8/dfs/dn/current: 251097ms
> 2018-07-26 10:47:08,283 INFO [Thread-106] 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Time to 
> add replicas to map for block pool BP-1508644862-xx.xx.xx.xx-1493781183457 on 
> volume /home/hard_disk/2/dfs/dn/current: 287235ms
> {noformat}
> Currently DN uses independent thread to scan and add replica for each volume, 
> but we still need to wait the slowest thread to finish its work. So the main 
> problem here is that we could make the thread to run faster.
> The jstack we get when DN blocking in the adding replica:
> {noformat}
> "Thread-113" #419 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f40879ff000 nid=0x145da 
> runnable [0x00007f4043a38000]
>    java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
>       at java.io.UnixFileSystem.list(Native Method)
>       at java.io.File.list(File.java:1122)
>       at java.io.File.listFiles(File.java:1207)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.listFiles(FileUtil.java:1165)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.BlockPoolSlice.addToReplicasMap(BlockPoolSlice.java:445)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.BlockPoolSlice.addToReplicasMap(BlockPoolSlice.java:448)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.BlockPoolSlice.addToReplicasMap(BlockPoolSlice.java:448)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.BlockPoolSlice.getVolumeMap(BlockPoolSlice.java:342)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsVolumeImpl.getVolumeMap(FsVolumeImpl.java:864)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsVolumeList$1.run(FsVolumeList.java:191)
> {noformat}
> One improvement maybe we can use ForkJoinPool to do this recursive task, 
> rather than a sync way. This will be a great improvement because it can 
> greatly speed up recovery process.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to