[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13082822#comment-13082822
]
Allen Wittenauer commented on HDFS-2231:
----------------------------------------
I don't think I took it out of context. You specifically said:
bq. That second scheme is not to use failover. In such a case, clients need to
know about where the active is running. Datanodes needs to know about where
both active and standby is running.
I read this as "something which is not failover has an active and a standby
that a client cares about"....which makes no sense. If a client cares about
the active server, it is using a failover architecture, no matter how it is
painted.
> Configuration changes for HA namenode
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-2231
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2231
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
> Assignee: Suresh Srinivas
> Fix For: HA branch (HDFS-1623)
>
>
> This jira tracks the changes required for configuring HA setup for namenodes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
