[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16645072#comment-16645072
]
Kitti Nanasi edited comment on HDFS-12946 at 10/10/18 2:47 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
I discussed with [~xiaochen] that I will take this task on.
[~ayushtkn], it's a good idea, I agree that it would be useful to link this
with the enable and set policy commands.
I also want to expose the result of this verify via JMX, I will upload a patch
soon.
was (Author: knanasi):
I discussed with [~xiaochen] that I will take this task on.
[~ayushtkn], it's a good idea, I agree that it would be useful to link this
with the enable and set policy commands.
I also want to expose the result of this verify via JMX as well, I will upload
a patch soon.
> Add a tool to check rack configuration against EC policies
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-12946
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12946
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: erasure-coding
> Reporter: Xiao Chen
> Assignee: Xiao Chen
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-12946.01.patch
>
>
> From testing we have seen setups with problematic racks / datanodes that
> would not suffice basic EC usages. These are usually found out only after the
> tests failed.
> We should provide a way to check this beforehand.
> Some scenarios:
> - not enough datanodes compared to EC policy's highest data+parity number
> - not enough racks to satisfy BPPRackFaultTolerant
> - highly uneven racks to satisfy BPPRackFaultTolerant
> - highly uneven racks (so that BPP's considerLoad logic may exclude some busy
> nodes on the rack, resulting in #2)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
