[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13090003#comment-13090003
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-395:
--------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12491439/explicitAcks.patch-5
against trunk revision .
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9)
warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
-1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests:
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
+1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/1150//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/1150//artifact/trunk/target/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/1150//console
This message is automatically generated.
> DFS Scalability: Incremental block reports
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-395
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-395
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: data-node, name-node
> Reporter: dhruba borthakur
> Assignee: Tomasz Nykiel
> Attachments: blockReportPeriod.patch, explicitAcks.patch-3,
> explicitAcks.patch-4, explicitAcks.patch-5, explicitDeleteAcks.patch
>
>
> I have a cluster that has 1800 datanodes. Each datanode has around 50000
> blocks and sends a block report to the namenode once every hour. This means
> that the namenode processes a block report once every 2 seconds. Each block
> report contains all blocks that the datanode currently hosts. This makes the
> namenode compare a huge number of blocks that practically remains the same
> between two consecutive reports. This wastes CPU on the namenode.
> The problem becomes worse when the number of datanodes increases.
> One proposal is to make succeeding block reports (after a successful send of
> a full block report) be incremental. This will make the namenode process only
> those blocks that were added/deleted in the last period.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
