[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13091641#comment-13091641
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HDFS-2264:
--------------------------------------------
I think for vip failover same kerberos principal like hdfs/vip-hostn...@bar.com
should be used. For some other failover scheme a different principal may work
but using same principal except for the hostname as in hdfs/_h...@bar.com, will
be simpler.
> NamenodeProtocol has the wrong value for clientPrincipal in KerberosInfo
> annotation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-2264
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2264
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: name-node
> Affects Versions: 0.23.0
> Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
> Assignee: Harsh J
> Fix For: 0.23.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-2264.r1.diff
>
>
> The {{@KerberosInfo}} annotation specifies the expected server and client
> principals for a given protocol in order to look up the correct principal
> name from the config. The {{NamenodeProtocol}} has the wrong value for the
> client config key. This wasn't noticed because most setups actually use the
> same *value* for for both the NN and 2NN principals ({{hdfs/_HOST@REALM}}),
> in which the {{_HOST}} part gets replaced at run-time. This bug therefore
> only manifests itself on secure setups which explicitly specify the NN and
> 2NN principals.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
